Practical AI skills
Work through approved or redacted practice examples and learn to check the output.
Train your team to use AI confidently. We also set up and train AI agents around approved practice knowledge, project workflows and review rules, with architects in control.
For principals, practice managers, project architects and BIM leads. No technical brief or new platform required.
Start with real tasks your team recognises: a project briefing, a coordination meeting or the search for an approved office standard. Learn what AI can do, what needs checking and where one pilot could help.
Published leadership session: half day · $5k–$7.5k AUD excluding GST. We confirm the format and scope with you first.Work through approved or redacted practice examples and learn to check the output.
Decide what data can be used, who reviews work and when the assistant must stop.
Document the task, owner, sources, review step and a useful success measure.
Training stands alone. A deeper audit or connected pilot is separately scoped.
Six workflow opportunities to assess with your team. These are illustrative use cases, not claimed architecture client results.
Turn approved meeting notes and client documents into a structured brief, missing-information checklist and draft action register.
Architect confirms the brief, scope and assumptions.
Help staff find approved office procedures, project precedents and specifications, with source links and access limited to their projects.
Architect checks suitability, currency and reuse rights.
Prepare meeting minutes, consolidate consultant questions and suggest owners for open actions without losing the original correspondence.
Project lead reviews technical decisions and deadlines.
Compare authorised schedules and document registers to surface changed items, missing fields and revision inconsistencies for review.
Design team approves drawings and specifications before issue.
Classify requests for information, retrieve the referenced revision and draft a response checklist or structured site-note summary.
Architect issues responses and makes contractual decisions.
Prepare project status, resourcing and time-use summaries from approved practice systems so principals can see exceptions sooner.
Practice lead approves fees, staffing and client commitments.
A useful first pilot does not need to design a building. It can remove repetitive preparation from a meeting your team already holds.
Synthetic example only. No real project data, live automation or performance result is shown.
Use consented meeting notes, the current project brief and a named document revision.
Draft decisions, open questions and proposed action owners, each linked to its source.
Correct names, responsibilities and technical meaning. Remove unsupported assumptions.
Only the reviewer-approved record is shared or added to the agreed project register.
No source or unclear revision? Flag it for review. Do not guess, issue a drawing or send a client response.
Keep the tools your practice relies on. Choose the next engagement only when the problem, permissions and value are clear.
Use the workshop Action Card or a deeper AI audit to agree priorities, owners and baseline measures.
Explore the AI auditUse approved practice knowledge, document examples and review rules. Test a controlled sample and check permissions before any live connection.
How implementation worksTrain the people using it, track actual quality and time, and expand only after the first workflow proves useful.
Explore ongoing supportDocument storage, email, practice management and BIM tools are reviewed before any connection. We do not assume a native Revit or Archicad integration, change a live model automatically or require Identify OS.
Agree client obligations, intellectual property, tool settings, retention and project-level access. Start with synthetic or redacted documents.
Use approved sources and versioned documents. Flag missing evidence and check the applicable code edition and local planning requirements.
Keep design, specifications, compliance, certification and contractual decisions with the responsible professionals. No unattended issue or approval.
Compare preparation time, accuracy, exceptions and review effort against a baseline. Keep an audit trail and a way to stop or roll back the workflow.
Explore the founder-built Clea and Indy AI platforms and the active Holman Barnes Group AI engagement. They demonstrate related capability, not a claimed architecture-practice rollout.
Explore our AI workBring one recurring task, a training need or a workflow that keeps getting in the way. We will help you decide where AI is worth starting.